Guardian

All posts tagged Guardian

Jon Henley is travelling through Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece to hear the human stories behind the European debt crisis. He hears from more readers in Portugal and Spain about their personal tales

People march during a protest in Lisbon

A protest in Lisbon this month. Thousands have marched against the government’s austerity measures. Photograph: Jose Manuel Ribeiro/Reuters

In Portugal, Claudia Barros writes that things are getting worse and worse:

Individuals filing for bankruptcy or having no money to purchase food, are becoming more and more common in Portugal. It’s not just what we’re used to having and not able to survive with less; people struggle to get a degree and then end up working 35 hours a week for €600 (£525) a month in supermarkets.
“And why is only the public sector going to have to pay extra taxes in November? I make €760 a month, work in the public sector, and am not happy about this at all. There are those who make €5,000 a month and will not be affected by this tax. Is it fair? In addition, public transport fares were increased in January, and again by 15% in September, with another 15% increase expected to happen next January. Electricity was also increased last month, and the tax on food went from 19% to 23%. Things will get worse before they get better.

Sergio Abreau, similarly, says:

The Portuguese prime minister has just announced more austerity on TV. One point of the agenda means no Christmas and summer bonuses for public sector workers who earn more than €1,000 a month in 2012, which means a cut from 14 to 12 pay cheques per year.
I’m a communication designer and I’m currently working for a Portuguese company that exports goods. These companies provide some kind of hope to balance our deficit. I’m almost 29, my car belongs to my family, I live in a rented flat and I have no kids. My generation is simply postponing its future. The result will be that in 10-15 years there will be a sudden decrease of the population. The younger generation will have gone abroad and the country will be left with old people.

Janet Sinclair in Braga isn’t happy and feels we’re sensationalising the issue:

The Portuguese are well aware that times are bad, and they have recognised that they are going to have to go through some tough times before the economy improves. Now they need to be allowed to focus on getting out of this mess without unnecessary pressure from the media whose interests in the crisis are far from objective.

Tiago Mota Saraiva, a Portuguese architect, sends a thoughtful post and argues the IMF‘s policies are not the right ones:

The general feeling of being in crisis has lasted almost a decade. Over that time wages have started to decrease, public investment in the productive fabric almost stopped and a huge process of emigration of the most qualified workers started. As is happening in other countries, Eurozone policies slowly damaged national economies. Portugal’s scale, economy and balance trade do not support a national currency that mirrors the German mark.
One of the consequences of this is that people that have a job are working more for less money. Another is a feeling of distrust on politicians and politics, that may open a door to populism and rightwing movements – as is already happening in other European countries. The last one, and the one that scares me the most, is the idea that we have to adapt ourselves to the conditions that are being imposed by the so-called markets.

This year, Portugal will be paying €7bnin interest rates to banks and sovereign debt speculators (the EU/IMF loan is still in its grace period). That amount is the same that Portugal will pay for all public officials. It’s unaffordable.
As we can see by Greece, austerity measures are not meant to rescue countries. Foreign interventions by the IMF are always meant to save speculators’ investments. As long as the IMF is in charge, the main policies will be focused on paying interest rates. In my opinion, we can only overcome this crisis, in Portugal and Europe, by rejecting and fighting back against the financial policies that are being imposed.

And moving on to Spain, Alex Watkins, a British journalist who works for the Costa Blanca News, writes:

There are a lot of issues here, ranging from home repossessions (16,464 so far this year) to expat families handing over their keys to the bank and simply going home – mostly because available work for them has dried up due to the soaring unemployment rate here.
A generation of young Spaniards dropped out of school to take jobs in construction during the property boom before the bottom fell out of the market, and they have now been left unemployed and unqualified.
Then there’s the regional government school building programmes which have been delayed for years, leaving pupils in overcrowded Portacabins which leak in the rain. One near me was built on reclaimed land in a ravine and actually moves when the rain is heavy.
Regional government cutbacks are biting and healthcare providers are threatening to suspend service if unpaid bills dating back several years are not paid.

Portuguese are ‘working more for less money’ | World news | The Guardian.

‘Portugal’s market has died. Banks aren’t lending. Everything is blocked’ | World news | guardian.co.uk.

Indignados Lisboa in Lisbon, Portugal

Indignados Lisboa planning Saturday’s demonstration in the Portuguese capital. Photograph: Jon Henley for the Guardian

There are maybe a 20 of them, sitting cross-legged on the grass as the shadows lengthen across the Príncipe Real gardens in Lisbon. A graphic designer, a primary school teacher, two economists, a photographer, a business intelligence analyst, an antique restorer, a tourist guide, aged from their mid-20s to their late 50s.

This evening they’re debating the main event of the weekend: Saturday’s demonstration and march through the Portuguese capital, finishing with a “people’s assembly” in front of the parliament building. What happens after that, they’re not quite sure; Lisbon’s last major protest parade, in March, saw 500,000 people take to the streets.

Indignados Lisboa, inspired by the Arab spring and the 15M movement in Spain, brings together people from all backgrounds: “Some are students,” says Luis Alves, a 30-year-old freelance graphic designer and one of the movement’s members. “Others took part in the 1974 revolution, and are sorry it didn’t bring about the society it should have.”

They are united by a desire for change.

“We believe that the people really do have the power,” continues Alves. “People think someone else will fix this, but we have to. The people who are supposed to find solutions, our elected representatives, clearly aren’t. We have to show we’re not merchandise in the hands of bankers and businessmen.”

The movement’s aims are ill-defined (“It’s normal, we’re only just beginning,” says Alves) but boil down, explains Pedro Murteira, a social education student, to common sense. A more participative democracy: a system that works for the good of all rather than the profit of a few.

“Something has to change,” says Alves. “We are not a rich country; the minimum wage here is just €485 [£425 a month] – even in Greece it’s €600. But taxes are going up, electricity’s being hiked by 30%, public transport too. People are getting desperate. There’s real despair.

“I have many friends who are thinking of emigrating. Only two of my friends have proper job contracts. I’m lucky, most of my work is for people outside of Portugal. The market here has died. Banks aren’t lending. Everything, economically and politically, is blocked.”

Murteira says he hopes the crisis will lead to “a whole new way of organising our lives, and of consuming. Not a personal perspective, but a collective perspective. Because the real problem isn’t the crisis, it’s the system. There’s a slogan, you know? No jobs, no houses, no security, no prospects – so no fear.”

After the May protests in neighbouring Spain, 50 or 60 Portuguese Indignados camped out for a week in Rossio square. They were heartened, Alves and Murteira say, by people’s reactions: elderly women who came to give them money; men in suits who brought bags of buns for breakfast.

“Sometimes,” says Murteira, “I think people understand. Then I walk through town on a Saturday night and I see the clothes and the shops and the consumption, and I doubt. But look, we have to come to our senses. The problems we face are so complex that we can only really solve them by a wholly new way of doing politics.”

• If you have a story to tell, know a person I should talk to or live in a place you think I should visit, please contact me: jon.henley@guardian.co.uk, or @jonhenley (the hashtag for this venture is #EuroDebtTales)

Two men walking along a dusty depression-era road, USA

Dust-bowl refugees walk towards Los Angeles during the Great Depression. House prices have now fallen further than in the 1930s. Photograph: Bettmann/Corbis

America clocked up a record last week. The latest drop in house prices meant that the cost of real estate has fallen by 33% since the peak – even bigger than the 31% slide seen when John Steinbeck was writing The Grapes of Wrath.

Unemployment has not returned to Great Depression levels but at 9.1% of the workforce it is still at levels that will have nerves jangling in the White House. The last president to be re-elected with unemployment above 7.2% was Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

The US is a country with serious problems. Getting on for one in six depend on government food stamps to ensure they have enough to eat. The budget, which was in surplus little more than a decade ago, now has a deficit of Greek-style proportions. There is policy paralysis in Washington.

The assumption is that the problems can be easily solved because the US is the biggest economy on the planet, the only country with global military reach, the lucky possessor of the world’s reserve currency, and a nation with a proud record of re-inventing itself once in every generation or so.

All this is true and more. US universities are superb, attracting the best brains from around the world. It is a country that pushes the frontiers of technology. So, it may be that the US is about to emerge stronger than ever from the long nightmare of the sub-prime mortgage crisis. The strong financial position of American companies could unleash a wave of new investment over the next couple of years.

Let me put an alternative hypothesis. America in 2011 is Rome in 200AD or Britain on the eve of the first world war: an empire at the zenith of its power but with cracks beginning to show.

The experience of both Rome and Britain suggests that it is hard to stop the rot once it has set in, so here are the a few of the warning signs of trouble ahead: military overstretch, a widening gulf between rich and poor, a hollowed-out economy, citizens using debt to live beyond their means, and once-effective policies no longer working. The high levels of violent crime, epidemic of obesity, addiction to pornography and excessive use of energy may be telling us something: the US is in an advanced state of cultural decadence.

Empires decline for many different reasons but certain factors recur. There is an initial reluctance to admit that there is much to fret about, and there is the arrival of a challenger (or several challengers) to the settled international order. In Spain’s case, the rival was Britain. In Britain’s case, it was America. In America’s case, the threat comes from China.

Britain’s decline was extremely rapid after 1914. By 1945, the UK was a bit player in the bipolar world dominated by the US and the Soviet Union, and sterling – the heart of the 19th-century gold standard – was rapidly losing its lustre as a reserve currency. There had been concerns, voiced as far back as the 1851 Great Exhibition, that the hungrier, more efficient producers in Germany and the US threatened Britain’s industrial hegemony. But no serious policy action was taken. In the second half of the 19th century there was a subtle shift in the economy, from the north of England to the south, from manufacturing to finance, from making things to living off investment income. By 1914, the writing was on the wall.

In two important respects, the US today differs from Britain a century ago. It is much bigger, which means that it benefits from continent-wide economies of scale, and it has a presence in the industries that will be strategically important in the first half of the 21st century. Britain in 1914 was over-reliant on coal and shipbuilding, industries that struggled between the world wars, and had failed to grasp early enough the importance of emerging new technologies.

Even so, there are parallels. There has been a long-term shift of emphasis in the US economy away from manufacturing and towards finance. There is a growing challenge from producers in other parts of the world.

Frenzy

Now consider the stark contrast between this economic recovery and the pattern of previous cycles. Traditionally, a US economic recovery sees unemployment coming down smartly as lower interest rates encourage consumers to spend and the construction industry to build more homes. This time, it has been different. There was a building frenzy during the bubble years, which left an overhang of supply even before plunging prices and rising unemployment led to a blitz of foreclosures.

America has more homes than it knows what to do with, and that state of affairs is not going to change for years.

Over the past couple of months, there has been a steady drip-feed of poor economic news that has dented hopes of a sustained recovery. Optimism has now been replaced by concern that the United States could be heading for the dreaded double-dip recession.

In the real estate market, which is the symptom of America’s deep-seated economic malaise, the double dip has already arrived. Tax breaks to homeowners provided only a temporary respite for a falling market and millions of Americans are living in homes worth less than they paid for them. The latest figures show that more than 28% of homes with a mortgage are in negative equity. Unsurprisingly, that has made Americans far more cautious about spending money. Rising commodity prices exacerbate the problem, since they push up inflation and reduce the spending power of wages and salaries.

Macro-economic policy has proved less effective than normal. That’s not for want of trying, though. The US has had zero short-term interest rates for well over two years. It has had two big doses of quantitative easing, the second of which is now ending. Its budget deficit is so big it has led to warnings from the credit-rating agencies, in spite of the dollar’s reserve currency status. And Washington has adopted a policy of benign neglect towards the currency, despite the strong-dollar rhetoric, in the hope that cheaper exports will make up for the squeeze on consumer spending.

Policy, as ever, is geared towards growth because the great existential fear of the Fed, the Treasury and whoever occupies the White House is a return to the 1930s. Back then, the economic malaise could be largely attributed to deflationary economic policies that deepened the recession caused by the popping of the 1920s stock market bubble. The feeble response to today’s growth medicine suggests that the US is structurally far weaker than it was in the 1930s. Tackling these weaknesses will require breaking finance’s stranglehold over the economy and measures to boost ordinary families’ spending power and so cut their reliance on debt. It will require an amnesty for the housing market. Above all, America must rediscover the qualities that originally made it great. That will not be easy.

Decline and fall of the American empire | Business | The Guardian.

Detail from photographic portrait of Charles D...

Image via Wikipedia

A new major study has found that almost half of the British working are failing to save enough for retirement, and one fifth do not save anything at all.

The study, the 7th Scottish Widows UK pension report, said only 51 percent of the population save adequately for their old age, the daily The Guardian reported.

The report is based on interviews with 5,200 adults, and shows there is “widespread and ingrained inertia” across the country, with savings levels remaining broadly consistent during the past five years, regardless of the economic downturn.

According to the report, people need, on average, an annual retirement income of £24,300 to live comfortably, down from the pre-recession figure of £27,900.

“Put simply, people need to save an extra £58 per month on average to prepare adequately for retirement and make up the shortfall we are seeing currently. That is roughly the cost of a cup of coffee every day,” said Ian Naismith of Scottish Widows.

“Even though for many this is realistic, and is in under the average £97.10 per month people say they can afford, we appreciate the difficulty in setting aside extra money. It’s about breaking through that inertia. And for some the amount that needs to be saved will be higher but it’s about taking small steps, getting on to the savings ladder and, more importantly, staying on it. Much higher saving levels are needed to get towards the average £24,300 a year people aspire to. The message is that everyone should be putting aside as much as they can afford for their retirement,” he added.

PressTV – Half of British fail to save for old age.

T. gondii constructing daughter scaffolds with...

Image via Wikipedia

Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:04

We don’t have the world quite as figured out as we’d like to think. This is a major reason why most people aren’t as interested as others in exploring space; we haven’t even come close to exploring our own back yards. While I am looking forward to reading about further study of Mars, and beyond, I tend to agree.

Why just last year 145 new species were identified in Greater Mekong, and another 200 new species were discovered in Papua New Guinea. On top of all that, the year 2010 saw 1/3 of formerly extinct animals suddenly “resurrected.”

Among the creatures that scientists are studying further are a frog that sounds like a cricket, a “sucker fish” which uses its body to stick to rocks in fast flowing waters to move upstream, and something called a “dracula minnow.”

And then there have been some recent discoveries that sound like the stuff of classic horror films. One involves “four newly discovered species of fungus turn carpenter ants into zombie ants to help them spread their spores.” Another recent story involves a microorganism that rewires the brain of its host, causing the host to put itself into harm’s way.

The mind-controlling fungus is something that researchers have been aware of; but it hadn’t been studied and cataloged until recently. From an article at The Guardian:

Ants become infected with the fungus when spores land on them from above, or when they encounter them on the forest floor. Once attached, the spores use enzymes to get inside the ant’s body where the fungus begins to grow. Within a week or so, chemicals released by the fungus cause the ant to wander off and bite on to leaf veins and other vegetation, moments before dying. Many ants are found in places where the conditions are perfect for fungal growth.

Once the ant has died, the fungus slowly sprouts from its head and grows a pod of spores which are fired onto the forest floor at night, to infect other ants.

About the mind-controlling microorganisms, here’s something unsettling from The Guardian:

Toxoplasma gondii is a microorganism that likes nothing better than to set up residence inside a warm-blooded host, typically a rat. The only time it gets particularly fussy over its surroundings is when it comes to sex, which can only take place in a cat. That poses a bit of a problem for the parasite, as rats aren’t known for their fondness of the feline race.

But T. gondii has a very clever trick up its sleeve: it rewires the rat brain. Rodents infected with T. gondii lose their instinctual fear of cats and engage in reckless risk-taking that sooner or later puts them into the jaws of a passing cat.

Should we be concerned that around 40% of the human race is infected with T. gondii?

For a long time, nobody thought so. T. gondii is known to cause birth defects and precipitate spontaneous abortions, and for that reason pregnant women are warned to stay away from cats. But it’s also one of any number of bugs that we pick up in our lifetime without experiencing any noticeable effects.

That perception changed when a Czech parasitologist named Jaroslav Flegr decided to look for evidence that T. gondii’s mind-meddling extends beyond rats. Testing the blood of drivers responsible for causing traffic accidents, he discovered they were two and a half times more likely to have been exposed to T. gondii than the general population. Might these drivers have been unwittingly egged on by a tiny parasite?

While recent research suggests that this microorganism isn’t able to impose the same kind of control that it can over a rat, the research does suggest that it is able to impose influence. You can read about Jaroslav Flegr’s traffic accident study HERE.

This find is intriguing. A microorganism that deliberately influences people and animals to engage in risky behavior is intriguing; and opens up many questions. Is this something to consider when hearing about someone who was gripped with the urge to drive into oncoming traffic? Is this microorganism something that could be utilized by us humans; for example, as a treatment for someone who is too shy?

Frank Swain looked at research linking changes in human behaviour to parasitic infection for a Radio 4 documentary Voodoo Wasps and Zombie Worms airing on Tuesday, and then re-airs on Thursday.

Mind-Controlling Microorganisms Are Among Us! | Before It’s News.

David Smith

The Guardian. April 2,2011


At least since Noah, and likely long before, we’ve stared in horror at catastrophe and tried to suss out deeper meaning – it was but weeks ago that the Tokyo governor, Shintaro Ishihara, declared that the earthquake/tsunami/ reactor tripleheader was “divine punishment” for excess consumerism. This line of reasoning usually fails to persuade these days (why are Las Vegas and Dubai unscathed by anything except the housing meltdown?) but it’s persistent. We need some explanation for why our stable world is suddenly cracked in half or under water. Still, over time we’ve become less superstitious, since science can explain these cataclysms. Angry gods or plate tectonics? We’re definitely moving towards natural explanation of crises.

Which is odd, because the physical world is moving in the other direction.

The Holocene – the 10,000 years through which we have just come – was by all accounts a period of calm and stability on Earth. Temperatures and sea levels were relatively stable. Hence it was an excellent time to build a civilisation, especially the modern kind that comes with lots of stuff: roads, buildings, container ports, nuclear reactors. Yes, we had disasters throughout those millennia, some of them (Krakatoa, say) simply enormous. Hurricanes blew, earthquakes rocked. But they were, by definition, rare, taking us by surprise – freaks, outliers, traumas that persisted in our collective history precisely because they were so unusual.

We’re now moving into a new geological epoch, one scientists are calling the Anthropocene – a world remade by man, most obvious in his emissions of carbon dioxide. That CO2 traps heat near the planet that would otherwise have radiated back to space – there is, simply, more energy in our atmosphere than there used to be. And that energy expresses itself in many ways: ice melts, water heats, clouds gather. 2010 was the warmest year on record, and according to insurers – the people we task with totting up disasters – it demonstrated the unprecedented mayhem this new heat causes. Global warming was “the only plausible explanation”, the giant reinsurer Munich Re explained in December, of 2010′s catastrophes, the drought, heatwave and fires across Russia, and the mega-floods in Pakistan, Australia, Brazil and elsewhere were at least plausibly connected to the general heating. They were, that is to say, not precisely “natural disasters”, but something more complex; the human thumb was on the scale.


We still have plenty of purely natural disasters – though scientists can posit reasons climate change might make the world more seismically active, tectonic and volcanic forces seem beyond our reach; the great wave that broke over Sendai really did come out of the blue. But even in Japan, of course, the disaster was not entirely “natural”. The subsequent fallout was… fallout, the invisible plume streaming from one of our highest-tech marvels, a complex reduced in minutes into something almost elemental, a kind of utility-owned volcano.

In a sense Ishihara was correct when he decried “selfish greed”. It is consumerism that has flooded the atmosphere with CO2: the constant getting and spending, where $1 spent liberates roughly 1lb of carbon. We are remaking the world, and quickly; we are stumbling into a new way of thinking about disaster, where neither God nor nature, but man is to blame.

That changes the valence of catastrophe. Since warm air holds more water vapour than cold, the atmosphere is nearly 5% moister than it was just a few decades ago. That loads the dice for great floods of the kind suddenly so common. I lived through one in my small mountain town in Vermont two summers ago: the biggest thunderstorm in our history dropped buckets of rain in a matter of hours. Our town is almost entirely intact forest; it should have been able to hold whatever nature threw at it. But that rain fell on a different planet from the one the forest had grown up on; every road washed out, and the governor had to visit by helicopter. But at least we had the solace (or self-lacerating realisation) that we’d helped cause this deep change. Americans burn more carbon per capita than just about anyone; what do you say to a Pakistani farmer watching the swollen Indus wash away his life’s work? And since global warming seems to take first aim at the poorest places that have done the least to cause it, this is a question we may be asking ourselves a good deal in the decades to come.

Not every natural disaster is unnatural now, and we may be able to fool ourselves a little longer. But these days it’s the climate deniers who act like the pious of yore, unable to accept the truth. I was surprised, and impressed, to read a poll of Americans taken recently. By healthy majorities, this most religious of western citizenries said natural disasters were more likely to be a sign of climate change than of God’s displeasure.

Which is good news, because for the first time in human history we can prevent a great deal of unnecessary cataclysm in the years ahead. Not all of it – there will always be earthquakes and hurricanes. But every bit of carbon we keep out of the atmosphere is that much less extra energy we add to the system. It’s that much less disaster waiting to happen.

Japan earthquake

March: Earthquake of magnitude 9.0 off the north-east coast of Japan, followed by a 15-20m high tsunami
Human cost: More than 10,000 dead; 17,000 missing
Economic cost: £189bn
Survivor’s story: Taiko Sawadate, 59, nurse, Otsuchi City
When the alarms rang, I had about 20 minutes to evacuate with my mother. We drove even higher than the recommended safe area, so I was sure it was OK. Someone shouted, “It’s coming” and I got out to have a look. The waters were upon us. I just about got my mother out of the car, but she tripped over. As I reached out to grab her, the tsunami swept us away. I was sure I was going to die.

It was dark in the water and I was being hit by debris on all sides. At one point, I saw an entire house coming towards me. But the surge forced me forward and suddenly up into the air and on to a slope. At last I could breathe. I really don’t know how long I was in the tsunami. The whole thing probably lasted less than a minute.

Some people found me and gave me dry clothes. I dressed my own wounds. About 20 of us evacuated to a house high on one of the slopes. We found six bodies that first day and more on the second, including my mother’s. It wasn’t far. I wrapped it in the cleanest sheet I could find and put a stone border around it. Then I covered it with a futon, so the crows could not get at it. I said a prayer and left her there. There are so many bodies, the authorities are not sure what to do with them all.

On the second day, a fire broke out on the mountain, and we didn’t have much food – just one piece of bread or one rice ball each for the day.

On the third day, the winds turned bitterly cold, so we walked for an hour to a public shelter at a school. When we arrived at Otsuchi, the city was still burning.

I have nothing left. My savings, bank book and ID cards are all washed away.

Eventually I want to move away from the coast. I feel bad about that, as my family have been here for more than five generations. But I’m too frightened to stay.
Jonathan Watts

Brazilian landslide

January: Torrential rainstorms trigger mudslides in the mountainous Serrana region outside Rio de Janeiro, the worst natural disaster in the country’s history.
Human cost: 916 dead; 345 missing Economic cost £187m
Survivor’s story: Mauricio Berlim, 35, undertaker, Teresopolis
Only the following day did the scale of the disaster become clear. The first family came in at about 2pm – they had lost four relatives, three adults and one child. By 10pm, I was organising 50 burials.

That night, cars and vans started turning up at the city morgue with bodies inside. I stayed until 4am – the bodies never stopped arriving, there were so many desperate families trying to identify their relatives. It was madness. People couldn’t find their relatives because the bodies were so dirty. It was terrible.

After two days we ran out of coffins. On the Friday I called our supplier and ordered more; we got through 175. Because there were so many dead, they moved the morgue into an old church. The bodies were laid out on long tables covered in black plastic sheets. We started using a truck instead of hearses to transport the bodies to the funeral parlour. Instead of taking one body at a time, we would take 10 or 15.


Until 20 days ago there were still bodies inside the church. Now I think there are none left. The problem now is death certificates – none has been issued yet. Many people are still missing.

Thank God, nobody in my family was killed. I have one friend who had to leave his house, because there was no water or electricity, but that was all.

The city is returning to normal, but there was no carnival this year. Every week there are protests, demanding the impeachment of the mayor. Things are confused. Many people still have nowhere to live.

In front of my office you can see one of the mountains that collapsed; one report said boulders came crashing down at 180km an hour.

My family has been in the funeral business for 106 years and no one had ever seen anything like it.Tom Phillips

Australian floods

November 2010-January 2011: Queensland and Victoria floods
Human cost: 37 dead, nine missing
Economic cost: £19bn – Australia‘s costliest natural disaster ever
Survivor’s story: Ashley Hay, 40, novelist, Brisbane
The silence was vast. There were no birds singing, no cars on the roads. The only sound was the tiniest turn of water retreating across our lawn. I had left home three days earlier, on a wet day, but a normal one, and came back to find my house a little yellow island jutting out of a wide brown sea.

Two days before, our suburb had been in a frenzy. My husband reported belongings being crammed into vans, trucks, cars – anything that would hold them. The traffic jammed as it tried to get to anywhere but here. Our grass, he said, was busy with flightless insects trying to get to higher ground: leeches, cockroaches, spiders. And it rained and it rained.

We knew how high the water had crept in Brisbane’s infamous 1974 flood. There were predictions of an extra metre this time. My husband took our son, some stuff, left most of what we owned, and went away.

Now, seeing our street, it was shocking. The Brisbane river had breached its banks, spilling across roads and parks, over cars and trees, to mark out a new shoreline, here, in our front garden. It was quiet and still and, the strangest thing of all, the sun was blazing down. The rain had stopped. The flood had peaked at 4.46m, a metre below the 1974 mark.

It was 13 January, and the water was ebbing towards the day’s first low. Suddenly, we knew the times and heights of the tides; suddenly we were attuned to its six-and-a-half-hour rhythm. Suddenly we were seafarers, watching our neighbours launch a boat from their drive. When the water drained away – it had gone by the next day – everything that had been immersed was a strange monochrome, halfway between brown and grey, fetid and slippy.


And then it began. Taking every single thing out, piece by piece, to decide if it could be saved. It was unreasonably exhausting. We washed; we dried; we papered the lawn. And after a few days, we threw it all away. Who cares about a notebook that stinks like a sewer? Who needs a Christmas decoration that drips dark muck from hidden crevices, no matter how many times you rinse it, shake it out, pat it dry?

Around us, houses were stripped and gutted – kitchens and bathrooms reduced to soggy piles of chipboard. A third of Brisbane’s annual landfill – more than 110,000 tonnes of rubbish – was dumped in a week.

The floods were almost three months ago now, and it’s still too quiet. We’re still the only people back on our strip. We tell ourselves we’re the luckiest people around.
Ashley Hay’s first novel, The Body In The Clouds, was shortlisted for the Commonwealth Writers’ Prize.

New Zealand earthquake

February: Earthquake of magnitude 6.3 hit the city of Christchurch
Human cost: 166 dead
Economic cost: £4.5bn-£6.75bn
Survivor’s story: Anne Malcolm, 71, counsellor, Christchurch
I don’t normally work on a Tuesday, but our counselling agency had a meeting from noon to 1pm [on the fifth floor of the Canterbury TV building]. The meeting was drawing to a close when, with no warning, the room exploded. Everything began to fly in all directions.

There had been aftershocks from the earthquake in September – we were used to the building wobbling. This was different. The explosion was sharp, jagged. Massive. I remember this sound of the structure breaking. The next thing I recall was being completely buried. I had very, very heavy masonry and beams on me.

Our floor, the top floor, came right down. There were 10 of us in the room and some rode down on the descending wall, almost surfed down with the building. Somehow the shock and adrenaline seemed to protect me, so in those first moments I didn’t experience intense pain. I felt safe. I felt I would survive.

Two young policemen arrived within seconds. They clambered on to the rubble and began digging. Soon after, I was in the ambulance. I had surgery, and now I’m in a rehabilitation unit. I have only one functioning limb. I guess I’m here for at least another three to four weeks, until I can begin using these limbs again.

In hospital, I’m on the ground floor. I can’t imagine going into a building that’s more than one level. When the aftershocks come, my heart rate increases, but then a staff member arrives to see how you are. How I’ll be when I get home, I don’t know.

My local supermarket has gone, my post office has gone, my bakery has gone – everything that was part of my village life is gone.

Our much-loved computer whiz-kid, who had been with us for 10 years, died on our floor. But on every other floor in that building, it’s the other way around – one or two people were rescued, but everyone else was lost. We were the fortunate ones.
Toby Manhire

Sri Lankan floods

January-February: Devastating floods hit the country; more rain fell in Batticaloa than it normally gets in a year
Human cost: 62 dead; 1.1 million displaced
Economic cost: £300m
Survivor’s story: Milvahanam Loganadan, 40, driver, Batticalao
It was about 7.30pm and we were sitting down to watch TV when we heard people making a lot of noise in the street outside. “The water is coming,” they were shouting. “It’s a flood.”

I didn’t know what to do – we have a seven-month-old baby and a four-year-old. But even before I could get to the door, the water was coming into the house. It was rushing in, so we picked up the children, ran out and kept going until we got to higher ground.

I convinced a rickshaw driver to take the rest of my family to my wife’s mother’s house, which is on top of a hill. It was chaotic. There had been no warning on the television or radio, so it was totally unexpected. It had been raining, certainly, but not enough for us to think that a flood was on its way.

Once my family were safe, I went back to the house to get valuables and documents. Everything else was ruined. I checked on the neighbours. The navy and police had got to our street with boats to evacuate the ones who couldn’t move themselves.

Most people moved in with relatives, but quite a lot of people ended up in camps for the displaced. Happily, there were no deaths among my friends and family, although I know other people did die. There were snakes in the water; that killed a few, I heard.

We spent a week cleaning the house and then the waters came again and we had to evacuate again, and then clean it up once more. All our furniture has gone, and my motorbike, but it could have been worse. I’ve got a job, which helps a lot. Most of the farmers have lost a lot of their crop and other people needed the dry rations the NGOs were handing out to stay alive.

It is the fear that is the toughest thing to deal with. The children were really frightened when it happened and Laksher, my four-year-old, is still scared that the waters will come again in the middle of the night.
Jason Burke

Burma earthquake

March: Magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck about 30 miles north of Tachileik on the Thai-Burma border
Human cost: At least 75 dead; more than 110 injured
Economic cost: Not yet known
Survivor’s story: Sai Noom Khan (not his real name), 23, Tachileik
I was with my wife watching television when a loud knocking started suddenly. The room started to shake and all our photos fell off the wall. It was terrifying. I had never experienced an earthquake before.

I was worried the house would collapse, so I grabbed my wife by the hand and we ran. We ran outside, but the ground was shaking so much it was hard to stand up. It lasted only about 40 to 50 seconds.

We live on the top of the mountain, so there wasn’t too much damage. Since the earthquake, everyone’s been sleeping outside. It’s cold, but we’re too scared to sleep indoors.

Yesterday I visited the villages of Tarlay and Mong Lin, about 30 miles away. They were devastated. I was told more than 100 people died there.

Greg Lowe

Philippines floods

January-March: Heavy rains continued from December last year
Human cost: At least 75 dead
Economic cost: £27m
Survivor’s story: Ray Calleja, 43, hospital porter, Leyte Province
We lost everything. It was the morning of 17 March. I watched, helpless, as our home was taken away by the floods. The only reminder that our house stood there was a lonely post. This was the first time I’ve seen the waters that high. I’m 5ft 5in and the floodwaters could have easily swallowed me. My wife and I saved every peso so we could buy the things we need. But we couldn’t take anything. We had to save ourselves. How will I have a house again? I’m 43, I earn P6,000 (£86) a month. That house cost us P30,000 (£430). When I saw everything we worked for all these years had disappeared, I cried.
Purple S Romero

South Africa floods

January: Severe storms, lightning and floods
Human cost: 91 dead, 321 injured
Economic cost: £73m
Survivor’s story: Amos Ndlovu, 47, unemployed painter, Diepsloot Township, Johannesburg
I’ve lived here for 10 years and this is the worst flooding I’ve known. There was heavy rain and I was afraid because I didn’t even know where to put my kids. We couldn’t open the front door because more water would come in, and it wasn’t even safe to open the window.

We wanted to stay inside, but we could see the water was a metre high, so we used a hatch to climb on the roof – we waited there for four or five hours. It was raining hard. We couldn’t run away because we had to look after our property.

That day was a disaster. Everything was washed away. Before the flood, we had power in the house, but now there is no electricity. Until they fix it, there’s nothing we can do.

We are using candlelight and it will be cold in winter. I felt very sad. The most precious thing I lost was my car. It was stuck in mud and filled with water, and now it won’t start. I’m not working at the moment and I don’t have money, so I can’t fix it.

It’s nobody’s fault, but I’m worried that it might happen again. The local government could do more to protect us. The system here is badly designed. If you build homes here, you must make a way for the water to run.

Natural disasters? | World news | The Guardian.

Chelsea’s Wedding
Let Them Eat Cake

By Paul Craig Roberts
8-2-10
It is not unusual for members of the diminishing upper middle class to drop $20,000 or $30,000 on a big wedding. But for celebrities this large sum wouldn’t cover the wedding dress or the flowers.
When country music star Keith Urban married actress Nicole Kidman in 2006, their wedding cost $250,000. This large sum hardly counts as a celebrity wedding. When mega-millionaire real estate mogul Donald Trump married model Melania Knauss, the wedding bill was $1,000,000.
The marriages of Madonna and film director Guy Ritchie, Tiger Woods and Elin Nordegren, and Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones pushed up the cost of celebrity marriages to $1.5 million.
Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes upped the ante to $2,000,000.
Now comes the politicians’s daughter as celebrity. According to news reports, Chelsea Clinton’s wedding to investment banker Mark Mezvinsky on July 31 is costing papa Bill $3,000,000. According to the London Daily Mail, the total price tag will be about $5,000,000. The additional $2,000,000 apparently is being laid off on US Taxpayers as Secret Service costs for protecting former president Clinton and foreign heads of state, such as the presidents of France and Italy and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who are among the 500 invited guests along with Barbara Streisand, Steven Spielberg, Oprah Winfrey, Ted Turner, and Clinton friend and donor Denise Rich, wife of the Clinton-pardoned felon.
Before we attend to the poor political judgment of such an extravagant affair during times of economic distress, let us wonder aloud where a poor boy who became governor of Arkansas and president of the United States got such a fortune that he can blow $3,000,000 on a wedding.
The American people did not take up a collection to reward him for his service to them.
Where did the money come from? Who was he really serving during his eight years in office?
How did Tony Blair and his wife, Cherrie, end up with an annual income of ten million pounds (approximately $15 million dollars) as soon as he left office? Who was Blair really serving?
These are not polite questions, and they are infrequently asked.
While Chelsea’s wedding guests eat a $11,000 wedding cake and admire $250,000 floral displays, Lisa Roberts in Ohio is struggling to raise contributions for her food pantry in order to feed 3,000 local people, whose financial independence was destroyed by investment bankers, job offshoring, and unaffordable wars. The Americans dependent on Lisa Roberts’ food pantry are living out of vans and cars. Those with a house roof still over their heads are packed in as many as 14 per household according to the Chillicothe Gazette in Ohio.
The Chilicothe Gazette reports that Lisa Roberts’ food pantry has “had to cut back to half rations per person in order to have something for everyone who needed it.”
Theresa DePugh stepped up to the challenge and had the starving Ohioans write messages on their food pantry paper plates to President Obama, who has just obtained another $33 billion to squander on a pointless war in Afghanistan that serves no purpose whatsoever except the enrichment of the military/security complex and its shareholders.
The Guardian (UK) reports that according to US government reports, one million American children go to bed hungry, while the Obama regime squanders hundreds of billions of dollars killing women and children in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
The Guardian’s reporting relies on a US government report from the US Department of Agriculture, which concludes that 50 million people in the US–one in six of the population–were unable to afford to buy sufficient food to stay healthy in 2008.
US Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said that he expected the number of hungry Americans to worsen when the survey for 2010 is released.
Today in the American Superpower, one of every six Americans is living on food stamps.
The Great American Superpower, which is wasting trillions of dollars in pursuit of world hegemony, has 22% of its population unemployed and almost 17% of its population dependent on welfare in order to stay alive.
The world has not witnessed such total failure of government since the final days of the Roman Empire. A handful of American oligarchs are becoming mega-billionaires while the rest of the country goes down the drain.
And the American sheeple remain acquiescent.
_______
Paul Craig Roberts was an editor of the Wall Street Journal and an Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. His latest book, HOW THE ECONOMY WAS LOST, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He can be reached at: <mailto:PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com>PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com