Yesterday in Canada, now in Minnesota. Never mind global warming, perhaps we got it all wrong. This video makes it look like we are in the beginning of a new ice age. Lou
Yesterday in Canada, now in Minnesota. Never mind global warming, perhaps we got it all wrong. This video makes it look like we are in the beginning of a new ice age. Lou
Mar 17, 2013
Extinction Level Methane Releases Caused by Geoengineering Chem-trails – further evidence of intentional genocide : http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/… High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program is connected to chemtrailing, microwaving the particulate at night further escalates the warming trend, and between chemtrails and Haarpoons, if it hasnt already reached the tipping point, as methane is releasing into the atmosphere now, continuing either program will eventually release trillions of tonnes of methane from frozen underground and undersea deposits making the planet burn up like some apocalyptic horror story. The kicker is that this is all avoidable! Stop the chemtrailing, stop the microwave and Haarp type facilities, (and end the wars… and gmo… and other agenda 21 crap…) Yikes theres a lot wrong in the world.
Why we have chemtrails and no one wants to talk about it. Everyone thinks it’s a scientific experiment. Lou
First international survey on the perception of geoengineering finds 72% of respondents approve of research
The British, American and Canadian public is largely in favour of research into engineering the planet’s climate to combat global warming, according to a study published on Monday. But critics said the paper was “not exactly disinterested science” because one of the authors is the founder and president of a geoengineering company.
The first international survey on the perception of geoengineering, published in the Environmental Research Letters of the Institute, comes at a critical stage as a major UK test project was recently postponed.
Scientists from Cambridge, Oxford, Reading and Bristol universities had planned to send a balloon with a hose attached 1km into the sky above Norfolk within months, to test the future feasibility of pumping hundreds of tonnes of minute chemical particles a day into the thin stratospheric air to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. But late in September, they delayed the test, citing the need to “allow time for more engagement with stakeholders.”
The new 18-question, internet-based survey, was “designed to ascertain how widespread public knowledge of geoengineering was and how the public actually perceived it.”
Some 72% of the 3,105 participants in the UK, US and Canada said they “somewhat” or “strongly” supported general research when asked: “Do you think scientists should study solar radiation management?”
But there was also significant support for views such as: “The Earth’s temperature is too complicated to fix with one technology”; “Humans should not be manipulating nature in this way”, or “Research into solar radiation management will lead to a technology that will be used no matter what the public thinks.”
Prof David Keith of Harvard University, one of the authors, said: “Some reports have suggested that opposition to geoengineering is associated with environmentalists, but our results do not support this view. We found that geoengineering divides people along unusual lines. Support for geoengineering is spread across the political spectrum and is linked to support for science concern about climate change. The strongest opposition comes from people who self-identify as politically conservative, who are distrustful of government and other elite institutions, and who doubt the very idea that there is a climate problem.”
But Jim Thomas from the Ottawa-based technology watch ETC Group, that campaigns against geoengineering, said: “This commissioned survey by a commercial company is not exactly disinterested science – it’s more like a marketing exercise by a high profile geoengineering advocate and his students.”
Thomas said that Keith was “consistently on the record as a supporter of real world geoengineering experiments”. He added: “Keith has designed ‘self levitating’ nanoparticles to be released in the upper atmosphere and managed a multi-million dollar private fund from Bill Gates from which he distributed monies to technicians developing geoengineering hardware to be used by private companies in experiments.”
Keith is also the founder and president of Carbon Engineering, a geoengineering company with 10 employees funded with around $6m by Gates and tar sands oil magnate Murray Edwards.
Keith told the Guardian: “To be clear, starting two years ago I did organise a commercial activity in CO2 removal [another form of geoengineering], but I believe that commercial activity in solar geoengineering should be restricted or where feasible prohibited.”
He said that ETC Group was “attacking the messenger, not the message”.
“We are happy to make all the survey materials publicly available. If the survey is wrong then ETC should work with a survey firm or an academic to produce a survey that contradicts these results. Our survey was reviewed by Nick Pidgeon, a leading expert on studying public reception,” he said. Pidgeon told the Guardian that, while he was a peer-reviewer for the study, he was not endorsing it any way.
Ashley Mercer, co-author of the study at the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy at the University of Calgary, said: “I can assure you the funding sources did not bias this research or its design. The goal was to simply assess current understanding and provide baseline data on emerging attitudes.”
Earlier this October, the Washington-based thinktank Bipartisan Policy Center published a major report calling for the United States and other countries to move forward on “climate remediation”. Prof John Shepherd, chair of the Royal Society’s Working Group on geoengineering, wrote in the Guardian in September that research would be “sadly necessary” because current greenhouse gas emission cuts and political will were not sufficient to stop global warming.
Bonus video: Kristen Meghan, former Air Force Bio-Environmental Engineer gave a ground breaking presentation of what she had discovered about Chemtrails while serving her Country.
I like this video because it shows in a few minutes some of the weirdest things going on in the planet. Watch it and tell me you are not wondering what the heck is going on.
Do you wonder sometimes if something else that we don’t grasp yet is at play in this reality ?
And, it is produced by Christians and most of the info is from the mass media.
If anything, it gives you a glimpse of what people are thinking.
Overview of fictional scenario for remaining myth believers
Imagine if once upon a time you were caught up in a dream posing a simple question. The question in the dream was: what if ‘persistent contrails’ were real? What if the claim that, ordinary planes can randomly fly around on warm, dry, cold, and moist days alike, and leave a condensation vapor trail that actually stays in the sky all day and even blocks off the sunlight; what if all of this were true?
In this world, condensation trails that persist in the sky and become clouds that block off our normal sunlight, turning sunny days into cloudy days, are a perfectly normal phenomenon. All concerns about the environment being attributed to these persistent trails would be open issues which would be discussed by appropriate environmental groups, politicians and concerned citizens on a regular basis.
In this fictional world, people everywhere, including the media and Hollywood, would be comfortable with a random discussion about condensation trails and the damage they pose or don’t pose to the equilibrium of the Earth and its atmosphere. If someone felt differently about the matter it wouldn’t be that big of a deal as it would be understood that everyone might see the issue slightly different.
In this scenario the typical person might be intrigued by the idea that there is a possibility that we don’t know just how much damage these persistent trails are causing. Groups that demanded to know where those experiments are that prove this to be a normal phenomenon would be considered a group of caring concerned citizens. Of course, in order to publicize important knowledge about the Earth, the atmosphere and the effect the persistent trails might have on both, we would witness a government that shares all of its scientific data with the scientific community and one that would even implement easy experimental steps for showing how persistent contrails come to be and how they persist in warm dry weather (southern California or Nevada for example). By sharing this simple information government might encourage monetary donations from the private sector for expanding solutions to this phenomenon. These easily reproducible experiments would likely even form the back-bone of elementary school science text books.
As we continue our journey in this fictional scenario we would note that the issue of persistent contrails naturally wouldn’t be associated with the unusual process of name calling someone crazy or paranoid for not believing these claims; instead, as with all simple non-political issues, the government would ignore such claims.
In this fictional world, any given day we might see or hear a report about studies being done to measure just how much less sunlight the Earth is receiving when the skies are covered and how that might impact global temperatures. In this world we would hear from geoengineers as they present all the proof of their claims. Networks, journalists and private citizens would challenge geoengineers who claim they want to spray the atmosphere and admit that this spraying can create an ice age.
Many would pose questions to such government hired geoengineers about how to put into perspective the incredible persistent contrails phenomenon already observed for years with the suggestions for spraying the atmosphere to make the Earth cooler. Some questions posed to government geoengineers might sound something like this:
If only for educational purposes, government would make information available for everyone, about where they can download these experiments that were conducted including its reproducible results in case someone wants to duplicate it as part of a school project.
Other considerations may include:
Passively calling out the wolf in sheep’s clothing
As your, ‘what if’, dream continues, people would regularly give accounts about the commercial planes in which they traveled, leaving trails of condensation that last all day. In some social circles it wouldn’t be impossible to hear two people playfully comparing contrail size or attributing certain plane types with longer or shorter contrails. Flight tracking data would regularly identify those commercial planes that are leaving persistent contrails and anyone could gather those plane flight numbers and keep an open list for everyone to see. Flights and trails might even be a part of an on-line game where you have to guess which plane will make contrails or how long these trails will be for that particular plane. In cold regions like the northeast or other parts of the world, under the right conditions commercial planes would possibly be seen still leaving long permanent trails even as they touch down at the airport runways.
On another note, given that persistent condensation trails are real, it may be observed that people old enough to remember might be a little dismayed as to how no advertising pictures, brochures, movies or family photos from the ’90s, and especially the ’80s and earlier indicated persistent contrails in the sky.
Given that planes have been around over 100 years, psychologists would likely pose scenarios for how entire generations of people now have no recollection of even one trail in the sky, yet now they are a normal phenomenon. As a result of this strange phenomenon, researchers, professors and students of both science and psychology would question why this might be and consider if it were possible that a multitude of generations all at once could be experiencing a memory problem. If confirmed, this memory problem could lead to some yet unknown insight about memory and how the brain works.
Finally, if this fictional world of persistent contrails were real, this article would be taken light-heartedly by those claiming they have confirmed that the persistent contrails are real. They would beam with confidence knowing that all their claims are scientifically sound. At the conclusion of this article they would quickly and confidently point to a huge volume of easy and reproducible experiments (not government abstracts) that put an end to the issue.
Upon the presentation of these easy, transparent experiments – and upon observing the manifestation of all the challenges presented here – those questioning this persistent contrails truth would giggle it off and attribute all of this activism and environmental concerns to a little misunderstanding of information that had been available but accidentally kept secret to the public.
Then, just as you ponder all of this information, you notice something happens. Just as you are considering all of these possibilities you WAKE UP and realize here we are in the real world and all that I have just described is fictional, never happened and never will.
What are you waiting for?
The time is now to become informed about the greatest crime of all time. Help expose chemical spraying operations that now threaten the equilibrium of the Earth due to global dimming. The constant spraying has also weaponized the atmosphere with metal particles and is creating a global dimming that is a threat to our absorption of sunlight needed for Vitamin D synthesis. Read up on the importance of vitamin D to the human body and try to see just how dangerous these operations are even if they decrease a fraction of the Earth’s sunlight or dump any amount of metal particles into the air that can cross the human blood-brain barrier (which nano-sized particles can easily do).
The next time you see a chemtrail plane remind yourself that the other 99 percent of planes flying over your local sky are NOT leaving trails. Videotape the entire spraying process from blue sky to white sky and then speed up the video with editing software to help you recognize the agenda a little more. See the patterns they are spraying; do your own soil, water, air or rain sample and see the elevated metal particle levels for yourself. Try to convince yourself to get involved in this battle for our environment and our lives.
This fictional scenario and the accompanying arguments are discussed to aid in illustrating all the things that are not happening regarding the quirky government ‘contrails’ claims and to remind us how dramatically incidental simple, honest studies differ from a planned, deceptive and ominous government-controlled agenda. The difference is miles long, can you appreciate this?
Bernie Suarez is an activist, critical thinker, radio host, musician, M.D, Veteran, lover of freedom and the Constitution, and creator of the Truth and Art TV project. He also has a background in psychology and highly recommends that everyone watch a documentary titled The Century of the Self. Bernie has concluded that the way to defeat the New World Order is to truly be the change that you want to see. Manifesting the solution and putting truth into action is the very thing that will defeat the globalists.
January 21, 2013
by: David Gutierrez, staff writer
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has announced that 2012 was not just the hottest year on record for the contiguous United States, but also had the second most “extreme” weather in recorded history.
Extreme weather was calculated using the U.S. Climate Extremes Index, which generates a numerical score based on extremes in temperature, precipitation and landfalling tropical cyclones. The 2012 score was nearly 100 percent higher than average, and was surpassed only by 1998.
The overall average yearly temperature for 2012 was 55.3°F, surpassing the 20th century average by 3.2°. It surpassed the prior record hottest year, 1998, by 1.0°. Annual temperatures were above average in every one of the contiguous states. In 19 states, 2012 was the hottest year ever recorded; in 26 states, it was the second hottest.
In fact, every single season in 2012 was hotter than average. The year began with the fourth warmest winter ever recorded, which led to the third smallest snow cover on record. Across the central and southern Rocky Mountains, in fact, snowpack totals were lower than 50 percent of normal. Low levels and retention of snowfall meant less available water later in the year.
Winter turned to spring with the warmest March ever recorded. Spring temperatures averaged 5.2° higher than normal, making it the hottest spring on record by a whopping 2.0°. This produced an early starting growing season, which led to early depletion of water from soil and laid the groundwork for a coming historic drought. Temperatures continued to break records in the summer, and July was actually the hottest month ever recorded in the contiguous United States, with an average temperature of 76.9° (3.6° higher than average). Autumn, too, was hotter than average.
Overall, 99.1 million people, nearly one-third the U.S. population, experienced 10 or more days of weather hotter than 100° this past year.
Every season of 2012 experienced lower-than-average precipitation. A severe drought hit in full force during the summer, with 61 percent of the contiguous United States affected in July. Yearly rainfall ended up being 2.57 inches below average, for the 15th driest year ever recorded. The dry weather fueled the third-largest wildfire season on record, with 9.2 million acres burned.
According to the NOAA report, the 2012 drought was roughly equivalent in footprint to that of the 1950s. Yet it failed to reach the intensity or duration of that drought, or of the devastating drought of the 1930s.
The number of North Atlantic tropical cyclones in 2012 was above average, with 19 named storms, 10 hurricanes, and one hurricane above Category 2. Therefore, 2012 tied with both 2011 and 2010 as the third-most-active tropical cyclone year on record.
The only extreme weather that put in a lower-than-usual showing in 2012 was tornadoes. The contiguous states experienced approximately 1,000 tornadoes in 2012, well below the average of roughly 1,200.
Overall, the year was marked by 11 weather-induced disasters that caused at least $1 billion in damage.
Sources for this article include:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130108131149.htm
Knowledge passed from generation to generation.
The fourth world shall end soon, and the fifth world will begin. This the elders everywhere know.”
We are told of the coming of the white- skinned men, like Pahana, but not living like Pahana. Men who took the land that was not theirs. And men who struck their enemies with thunder.
A strange beast like a buffalo, but with great long horns, will overrun the land in large numbers.
The land will be crossed with snakes of iron.”
The land shall be criss-crossed by a giant spider’s web.
The land shall be criss-crossed with rivers of stone that make pictures of the sun.
You will hear of the sea turning black, and many living things dying because of it.
You will see many youth, who wear their hair long like my people, come to join tribal nations, to learn their ways of wisdom.
You will hear of a dwelling-place in the heavens, above the earth, that shall fall with great crash. It will appear as a blue star. Very soon after this, the ceremonies of my people will cease. These are the signs that great destruction is coming. The world shall rock to and from. The white man will against other people in other lands_with those who possessed the first light of wisdom.
The Nibiru cataclysm is a supposed disastrous encounter between the Earth and a large planetary object (either a collision or a near-miss) which certain groups believe will take place in the early 21st century. Believers in this doomsday event usually refer to this object as Planet X or Nibiru. The idea that a planet-sized object could collide with or pass by Earth in the near future is not supported by any scientific evidence and has been rejected as pseudoscience by astronomers and planetary scientists.
The idea was first put forward in 1995 by Nancy Lieder, founder of the website ZetaTalk. Lieder describes herself as a contactee with the ability to receive messages from extra-terrestrials from the Zeta Reticuli star system through an implant in her brain. She states that she was chosen to warn mankind that the object would sweep through the inner Solar System in May 2003 (though that date was later abandoned) causing Earth to undergo a pole shift that would destroy most of humanity. The prediction has subsequently spread beyond Lieder’s website and has been embraced by numerous Internet doomsday groups, most of which link the event to the 2012 phenomenon. Although the name “Nibiru” is derived from the works of the late ancient astronaut writer Zecharia Sitchin and his interpretations of Babylonian and Sumerian mythology, Sitchin denied any connection between his work and various claims of a coming apocalypse.
I need your strength and wisdom.
Let me walk in beauty and make my eyes ever behold the red and purple sunset.
Make my hands respect the things you have
made and my ears sharp to hear your voice.
Make me wise so that I may understand the things you have taught my people.
Let me learn the lessons you have
hidden in every leaf and rock.
I seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy – myself.
Make me always ready to come to you
with clean hands and straight eyes.
So when life fades, as the fading sunset,
my Spirit may come to you without shame.
~ Chief Yellow Lark, 1887 ~
2 Nov 2012
This phenomenon is called “Parhelia” — for more on that go here: http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/mtr/opt/ice/sd.rxml
NASA solar physicist David Hathaway captured the above photo (link below) in Huntsville, Alabama two days ago after seeing the strange rings surrounding the afternoon sun.
NASA’s Meteoroid Environment Office head Bill Cooke says that he had, “never seen anything quite like it.” Another onlooker, Kyle Winkleman, called it a “once-in-a-decade event.”
Spaceweather writes that the extremely rare apparition was “almost certainly connected to Hurricane Sandy”:
The core of the storm swept well north of Alabama, but Sandy’s outer bands did pass over the area, leaving behind a thin haze of ice crystals in cirrus clouds. Sunlight shining through the crystals produced an unusually rich variety of ice halos.
“By my count, there are two sun dogs, a 22 degree halo, a parahelic circle, an upper tangent arc, and a parry arc,” says Chris Brightwell, who also photographed the display. “It was amazing.”
HERE is an info graphic naming all the parts of the parhelia: http://imageshack.us/a/img194/3299/photographercapturesrar.png
These were all recorded a few days or less prior to Hurricane Sandy making landfall.
Beautiful, strange, rare, and surreal o.o;!! Thanks to the uploaders for recording and sharing !
Sorry I know this one is kinda lengthy but it’s so pretty and strange 0.0!!
Science & Technology
A shocking new analysis warns that if the danger of climate change continues to be ignored by the world’s governments, the encroaching disaster could claim the lives of 100 million people in the next two decades and lost economic prosperity to in world economies would be measured in the trillions of dollars.
Findings contained in the “Climate Vulnerability Monitor”—a study sponsored by 20 nations and conducted by the humanitarian and development research organization DARA—point to unprecedented harm to human society and current economic development if runaway carbon emissions are not contained and new models of energy generation and consumption are not pursued.
“A combined climate-carbon crisis is estimated to claim 100 million lives between now and the end of the next decade,” the report said.
The study estimates human and economic impacts for 184 countries in 2010 and 2030 across a wide range of separate effects. Indicators of impact range from issues such as hunger and skin cancer, to permafrost thawing and sea-level rise, indoor and outdoor air pollution, and fisheries, biodiversity and forest deterioration.
Responding to the report, Oxfam International executive director Jeremy Hobbs told Reuters that the costs of political inaction on climate were “staggering”.
“The losses to agriculture and fisheries alone could amount to more than $500 billion per year by 2030, heavily focussed in the poorest countries where millions depend on these sectors to make a living,” he said.
Connie Hedegaard, the European Union’s climate chief, warned that extreme weather was becoming more common, as the effects of climate change take hold. “Climate change and weather extremes are not about a distant future,” she wrote in a comment for the Guardian last week. “Formerly one-off extreme weather episodes seem to be becoming the new normal.”
The report, which is being officially presented in New York City on Wednesday, is the second such study conducted by DARA. The first was released in 2010.
“1.3 billion people are still fighting their way out of the most extreme forms of poverty while major economies are today fighting their way out of crippling financial and economic crises,” said DARA Trustee and former president of Costa Rica José María Figueres in response to the report’s findings.
“Governments and international policy makers must act decisively to combat the spiraling costs to national and global GDP resulting from inaction on climate change,” he said. “The Monitor shows how failure to do so has already caused unprecedented damage to the world economy and threatens human life across the globe. With the investment required to solve climate change already far below the estimated costs of inaction, no doubt remains as to the path worth taking.”
The new Monitor report, subtitled “A Guide to the Cold Calculus of A Hot Planet (pdf),” juxtaposes on the one hand the large-scale anticipated increases in fossil fuel consumption over the coming decades with the enormous human and developmental consequences of this. However, it also points out that decisions taken on cold monetary terms alone would actually favour strong action on climate change globally and regionally.
Key findings from the report include the following estimates:
• Failure to act on climate change already costs the world economy 1.6% of global GDP amounting to $1.2 trillion in forgone prosperity a year
• Rapidly escalating temperatures and carbon-related pollution will double costs to 3.2% of world GDP by 2030
• Losses for lower-income countries are already extreme: 11% of GDP on average for Least Developed Countries already by 2030
• Major economies are heavily hit: in less than 20 years China will incur the greatest share of all losses at over $1.2 trillion; the US economy will be held back by more 2% of GDP; India, over 5% of its GDP
• Economic losses dwarf the modest costs tackling climate change: emission reductions at just 0.5% of GDP for the next decade; and support to the vulnerable: a minimum of $150 billion per year for developing countries