David Suzuki speaks out against genetically modified food
Canada’s foremost environmental conscience says GM food is bad science.
David Suzuki speaks out against genetically modified food
Canada’s foremost environmental conscience says GM food is bad science.
Are we being prepared for something? This new generation of children will be incorporating the existence of aliens and hybrid humans as reality.
It is just a matter of time before someone adds artificial intelligence to the doll. It is going to be a fascinating century. If we make it.
Oct 24, 2013
If terms such as adenine and guanine bring you memories of the school course of biology, here you will see a reason to give to these words a second meaning. A group of scientists discovered that these two, as well as the other building blocks of DNA, can form in space and could have been brought to the surface of Earth by meteorites.
Meteorites found in Antarctica and Australia make scientists believe that the building blocks of DNA exist in space. In order to reach this amazing conclusion the researchers analyzed a series of 12 meteorites collected in Antarctica and Australia.
Inside, the scientists found a ‘treasure’ of molecules that may play an important role in the formation of early life forms. The adenine, which helps build the ‘stairs’ of the DNA helix, was present in eleven meteorites. The guanine, another key component of DNA, was present in eight ones.
Two of the 12 meteorites contain exotic particles that are very rare on Earth, thus demonstrating that the building blocks of DNA must have been formed in space. The discovery confirms the theory that a set of prefabricated sections on a meteorite or a comet could have given rise to life on Earth.
I am re-posting this story because nothing has been said about it since. This is real. This is not a movie. Think of the implications…Lou
November 24, 2011
A virus with the potential to kill up to half the world’s population has been made in a lab. Now academics and bioterrorism experts are arguing over whether to publish the recipe, and whether the research should have been done in the first place.
The virus is an H5N1 bird flu strain which was genetically altered to become much more contagious. It was created by Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, who first presented his work to the public at an influenza conference in Malta in September.
Fouchier said the strain circulates in animals, particularly birds, but rarely affects humans.
In the ten or so years since bird flu first emerged in Asia, fewer than 600 cases have been reported in humans. But the H5N1 strain is particularly vicious, killing roughly half of patients diagnosed with it. What stops it from becoming a major threat to public health is that it does not readily transmit from human to human. Or at least it didn’t – until now.
Researchers in Fouchier’s team used ferrets – test animals which closely mimic the human response to influenza – and transmitted H5N1 from one to another to make it more adaptable to new hosts. After 10 generations, the virus had mutated to become airborne, which means ferrets became ill from merely being near other diseased animals.
A genetic study showed that the new, dangerous strain had only five mutations compared to the original one, and all of them were earlier seen in the natural environment – just not all at once. Fouchier’s strain is as contagious as the human seasonal flu, which kills tens of thousands of people each year, but is likely to cause many more fatalities if released.
“I can’t think of another pathogenic organism that is as scary as this one,” Paul Keim, a microbial geneticist who has worked on anthrax for many years, told Science Insider. “I don’t think anthrax is scary at all compared to this.”
Now Keim, who chairs the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), and other members of the body, have a very difficult decision to make. Fouchier wants his study to be published. So does virologist Yoshihiro Kawaoka, who led similar research in collaboration with the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and the University of Tokyo, and reached comparable results. And it is up to NSABB to give them the green light.
Many academics and biosecurity experts are naturally cautious about releasing information which could provide any bioterrorist with a ready recipe to hold the world to ransom. Some argue that such work should never have been done in the first place and call for international monitoring of potentially harmful research.
“It’s just a bad idea for scientists to turn a lethal virus into a lethal and highly contagious virus. And it’s a second bad idea for them to publish how they did it so others can copy it,” believes Dr. Thomas Inglesby, a bioterrorism expert and director of the Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
However the very same data, if made available to the scientific community, could potentially allow humanity to prepare for an H5N1 pandemic, which Fouchier’s study has shown to be far more probable than was previously believed. Clamping down on freedom of information in the scientific domain may in the end leave us defenseless against the flu, should it arise naturally.
NSABB plans to issue a public statement soon, says Keim, and is likely to issue additional recommendations about this type of research. “We’ll have a lot to say,” he says.
The theory is not new, but at least it’s getting some scientific interest. Now you know why I love those Ancient Aliens theories. Lou
Oct 17, 2013
As the Discovery.com states, scientists from Kazakhstan claim that human DNA is encoded with an alien signal from an ancient alien civilization.
Calling it “biological SETI”, the researchers argue that the mathematical code in human DNA can not be explained by evolution.
“Once established, the code can remain unchanged in cosmological timescales. Actually, it is the most durable construction ever known. Therefore, it is an extremely reliable storage for an extraterrestrial signature.” the scientists wrote in the journal Icarus.
“Once the genome correctly rewrites the new code with a signature, it stays frozen in the cells of its progeny and can then be delivered through time and space.”
The scientists also believe that human DNA is arranged in such a way that it looks like a “set of numerical and ideographic standards of a symbolic language.”
The research has led the scientists to a conclusion that humans were created “outside our solar system several billion years ago.”
The theory supports the hypothesis that the Earth is the result of interstellar life forms distributed by asteroids and comets.
So if we are only carriers of extraterrestrial communication, what secret message does our DNA transfer?
And if we are a creation of aliens then who created them?
OK, this one is kind of dry. It’s a lecture really, but it is well done, has plenty of images, and the subject is interesting. You heard of the Annunaki? Well this lecture will bring you up to speed on what is being hypothesized at the moment.
You might end up believing that we have been engineered half a million years ago. Don’t dismiss the idea. The truth is always stranger than fiction, no?
54-year-old Professor Park Se-pill of Jeju National University in South Korea was seriously injured after being attacked by a cloned cow that he created in 2009. He has suffered a spinal injury and 5 broken ribs and will need 8 months of treatment before recovering.
According to Cosmos Magazine the researchers took cells from the ear of a bull before it was butchered in 2008. They kept these cells in cold storage before using them to fertilize eggs which were implanted into a cow.
In the years since the cloning took place the research has been uneventful until this recent attack.
“Park was video-recording a black cow, which he cloned from species indigenous to Jeju four years ago, and all of a sudden, it charged and attacked him for 15 minutes,” a school official said.
“The 800-kilogram black cow is very strong because its cell donor was the best available. Park could not escape easily because he wore a special suit and long boots. He is now being treated at the university hospital.”
Park said that he would take part in the reports even if he has to be in a wheelchair.
“We didn’t have the cow neutered because we have to check its virility. Hence, it often gets very restless,” Park said.
According to Wikipedia, this is the full list of animals who have been cloned so far:
 Cloned black cow attacks its ‘creator’ – Korea Times
 South Korean researchers clone endangered cow – Cosmos
 List of Cloned Animals – Wikipedia
By Carolanne Wright
September 21, 2013
If you believe that you are at the mercy of your genetic code, great news, you’re not. According to the science of epigenetics (the study of how environmental factors outside of DNA influence changes in gene expression), stem cells and even DNA can be altered through magnetic fields, heart coherence, positive mental states and intention. Top scientists around the world agree: genetic determinism is a flawed theory.
The DNA we are born with is not the sole determinant for our health and well-being. Stem cell biologist Bruce Lipton, Ph.D., discusses the important difference between genetic determinism and epigenetics in an interview with SuperConsciousness magazine:
“The difference between these two is significant because this fundamental belief called genetic determinism literally means that our lives, which are defined as our physical, physiological and emotional behavioral traits, are controlled by the genetic code. This kind of belief system provides a visual picture of people being victims: If the genes control our life function, then our lives are being controlled by things outside of our ability to change them. This leads to victimization that the illnesses and diseases that run in families are propagated through the passing of genes associated with those attributes. Laboratory evidence shows this is not true.”
Lipton’s theory is confirmed by Carlo Ventura, M.D., Ph.D., professor and researcher at the University of Bologna in Italy. Dr. Ventura has shown through lab testing that the DNA of stem cells can be altered using magnetic field frequencies.
“It’s like a time machine. You’re reprogramming somehow backward with these cells to an uncertain state in which any kind of decision is somehow possible; even the decision to become virtually any kind of cell of the organism. And just think about the tremendous potential of this discovery.”
He adds that two Nobel Prize-winning scientists discovered even “nonstem adult cells can be epigenetically reprogrammed backward to a state where they can eventually give rise to neural cells, cardiac cells, skeletal muscle cells or insulin-producing cells.”
According to the Institute of HeartMath in Boulder Creek, California, epigenetics encompasses far more than just DNA, our environment and life experience. After two decades of study, the researchers discovered factors like love and appreciation or anxiety and anger also influence a person’s blueprint. In one experiment, select participants were able to change DNA with positive mental states.
“An individual holding three DNA samples was directed to generate heart coherence – a beneficial state of mental, emotional and physical balance and harmony – with the aid of a HeartMath technique that utilizes heart breathing and intentional positive emotions. The individual succeeded, as instructed, to intentionally and simultaneously unwind two of the DNA samples to different extents and leave the third unchanged.”
Control group volunteers who had low heart coherence were unable to alter the DNA.
If we want to nourish our bodies at a cellular level (and not promote disease), the institute recommends an abundant diet of quantum nutrients. When we are stressed or negative, our biological energy reserves are diverted from the important task of regenerating and repairing the body. We can counteract this cellular starvation by focusing on genuine states of care, appreciation and love. These positive emotions enhance our energy system and feed the body, even down to the level of DNA. HeartMath calls such positive feelings “quantum nutrients.”
About the author:
Carolanne enthusiastically believes if we want to see change in the world, we need to be the change. As a nutritionist, natural foods chef and wellness coach, Carolanne has encouraged others to embrace a healthy lifestyle of organic living, gratefulness and joyful orientation for over 13 years. Through her website www.Thrive-Living.net she looks forward to connecting with other like-minded people who share a similar vision.
Part of an interview by Dr. Joseph Mercola with Dr. Don Huber, an agricultural scientist and expert in microbial ecology who has discovered a new organism in GE animal feed—an organism that has since been clearly linked to infertility and miscarriage in cattle, horses, pigs, sheep, and poultry, which he also links to human fertility problems. The full interview is on Mercola’s YT channel and website here:
September 18, 2012
It seems that we are moving towards a new era of eugenics, and in the near future, our choice of a partner will be based not on the feelings of love, but on the compatibility of our genes.
In the dystopia Gattaca full-fledged members of society could be only people born after a careful examination of the genetic code. All others were assigned the role of cleaners.
Professor Armand Leroi from King’s College London predicts that a steadily decreasing cost of DNA scan can lead to a society based on the genetic superiority.
At the Open Forum «Euroscience» 2012 inDublin, Leroi said that in his opinion, in the next five to ten years, paying to access one’s complete genetic code will be a standard practice for young people.
It is quite natural that the desire to have healthy children will lead future generations to want to assess the genetic diagram of their prospective partner. Having the necessary information, future couples will be able to use the technology of artificial insemination to conceive a child that will not be subject to any incurable disease.
However, he adds, it is unlikely that people will have the “luxury” to use technology to create a child with a certain intelligence level or eye color, but instead will focus more on the prevention of severe genetic diseases.
Leroi also said that the cost of genetic sequencing drops so quickly that “very, very soon it will be very, very affordable“. As an example, he pointed out that the price of genetic sequencing fell from one million a decade ago to about four thousand dollars today.
He noted that, in a sense, eugenics is already with us, since every year, tens of thousands of abortions are performed for children with Down syndrome and other genetic diseases.
“These processes already take place in most European countries. Many of the ethical issues that arise when people talk about neoeugenics disappear as soon as you start to offer a selection of genes or choice of a partner as a eugenic tool. We have actually come to the determination of the genes that make a person.”
Philip Taylor of the Christian medical fraternity says that society should “recognize and resist the eugenic way of thinking“.
“The growing obsession in our society by celebrity status, physical perfection and high intelligence fuels the view that people with various disabilities or genetic diseases are somehow not worth to live“, saidTaylor in an interview for a British newspaper.
“We have to recognize and resist the eugenic thinking. Our priorities should be the development of drugs and supportive measures for people suffering from genetic diseases, and not the destruction of these people before they are born“, she adds.
Just came across this article from June 2012. It is not proof that the US created AIDS but it is pretty darn good accusation. Lou
06 June 2012
by Susanne Posel
In the rainforest of south-east Cameroon 80% of the meat eaten is “bushmeat”. The indigenous people consume a diet of gorilla, chimpanzee or monkey.
It is estimated that an excess of 30,000 gorillas are killed in Cameroon each year for their meat.
The habits of tribes like those in Cameroon are now being blamed for the transmission of viruses like the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) which is purported by mainstream scientists to have originated in chimpanzees.
Babila Tafon of the Ape Action Africa (AAA) a primate sanctuary claims to have found a new virus in the apes arriving at the AAA. It is a simian “foamy” virus, closely related to HIV. Tafon explains: “A recent survey confirmed this is now in humans, especially in some of those who are hunters and cutting up the apes in the south-east of the country.”
Transfer of viruses from ape to human occur when the primate bites or scratches, however, some assert that eating primate meat (although cooked) is a transferable way for the new virus to reach humans.
Professor Dominique Baudon, the director of the Cameroon Centre, blames the practice of eating bushmeat for the transfer of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) which then trans-mutated into HIV in humans.
Following the storyline of “HIV came out of Africa” researchers at the Wilford Hall United States Air Force Medical Center and San Antonio Military Medical Center, have concluded that people of African descent are more likely to have a genetic trait that makes them “more susceptible” to contracting the HIV virus.
Matthew Dolan, co-author of the study suggests: “The benefit that the Africans got from a mutation that gave them some resistance to malaria has, statistically at least, rendered them some increased susceptibility to HIV.”
The question researchers asked was: how do some people exposed to HIV contract the virus while others do not?
The study analyzed more than 1,200 US military service men and women infected with HIV to answer questions about the genetic aspects of the disease.
In 60% of African-Americans and 90% of Africans, a genetic trait was identified that made HIV 40% more prevalent than in Caucasians.
These researchers did not consult Wangari Maathai, a Kenyan ecologist and Nobel Peace Prize winner, who says that HIV was created deliberately in a laboratory as a biological weapon.
Maathai stated at a press conference after receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize that: “Some say that AIDS came from the monkeys, and I doubt that because we have been living with monkeys (since) time immemorial, others say it was a curse from God, but I say it cannot be that.”
Maathai maintains that HIV was created by “agents to wipe out other people . . . In fact [the HIV virus] was created by a scientist for biological warfare. Why has there been so much secrecy about AIDS? When you ask where did the virus come from, it raises a lot of flags. That makes me suspicious.”
She asserts that HIV was created for the purposes of population control in Africa.
Dr. Alan Cantwell, MD agrees with Matthai’s summation of the origins of HIV.
Cantwell explains: “After the smallpox vaccine story hit the front-page of The London Times, the story was subsequently killed and never appeared again in any of the world major media. The smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the World Health Organization was responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa. About 100 million Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible for awakening a ‘dormant’ AIDS virus on the continent. I am sure the ‘big business’ of vaccine makers had something to do with censoring the story. Also the Times story provided another explanation for the outbreak in Africa other than the widely-accepted ‘monkey in the African jungle’ theory of HIV/AIDS.”
Cantwell believes that primates were injected with various cancer-causing and immunosuppressive viruses, as part of primate animal cancer research conducted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
In the 1970’s, at Fort Detrick in Maryland, Richard Nixon joined the NCI with the military’s biological warfare unit.
Cantwell asserts: “There is NO PROOF that AIDS, which first appeared EXCLUSIVELY in young (primarily white) gay men in Manhattan, came from Africa. This is yet another myth about AIDS. How could a supposed black heterosexual African epidemic transform itself into an EXCLUSIVELY WHITE YOUNG GAY MENS’ DISEASE IN MANHATTAN? In my opinion this is biologically impossible. Furthermore, there was no ‘incubation period’ for HIV in America. As soon as the government-sponsored gay hepatitis B experiment (1978-1981) ended in Manhattan in 1981 the epidemic became official. The first cases of AIDS in gay men appeared in Manhattan in 1979, soon after the gay experiment began in Manhattan, New York City.”
Dr. Robert Strecker has explained in his books that Africans were infected with HIV during the smallpox vaccine distribution; as laid out by WHO in a memorandum from 1972.
Prior to 1979, there were no reported cases of HIV/AIDS in Africa, according to Luc Montagnier, a French Pasteur scientist. By calculating Montagnier’s isolation of the first HIV case in Paris, France, the first cases of HIV must have begun in the fall of 1982.
While AIDS are first announced in 1981, there were yet no reported cases proving that there was an African epidemic.
Those populations in under developed nations like Africa succumb to the disease much quicker. Because of the lack of access to medical care, up to 40% of the population is estimated to be killed off.
Experiments conducted by Myron Max Essex at Harvard explained that prior to the HIV outbreak in Africa scientists had foreknowledge that retroviruses cause immunosuppression, by studying feline leukemia viruses.
Robert Gallo, who participated in this research, later admitted that HIV was a government created bio-weapon.
According to an annual volume of the Special Cancer Virus Program , human experimentation with cancer-causing and immunosuppressive viruses was essential. With the “gay plague” and “gay cancer’, such experiments were no longer necessary. The deaths of thousands of gay men proved with these viruses caused cancer, immunosuppression, and were sexually-transmissible between people.
Just as the human radiation experiments administered radioactive elements to unsuspicious Americans, so the HIV virus was unleashed onto the unsuspecting African people receiving a smallpox vaccine.
Last month the first human study conducted for clinical trials commenced with the hopes from the pharmaceutical industry that Vacc-C5, the “HIV vaccine”, would prove successful.
Oslo University hospital hosted the study of Bionor Pharma ASA’s Vacc-C5 believed to slow down or stop induction of immune hyper-activation. This vaccine attacks the virus’s ability to produce, therefore making it the perfect candidate to be a preventive vaccine; administered to everyone eventually.
However, a vaccine trial conducted by rival drug corporation Merck, the HIV Vaccine Trial Network and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases claimed that 24 of 741 volunteers who got the vaccine in one segment of the experiment later became infected with HIV, which causes AIDS. In a comparison group of volunteers who got the placebo, 21 of 762 participants also became infected.
Propaganda articles in mainstream media are pro-HIV vaccine. They claim that “the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNAIDS combined existing research and evidence to develop a Strategic Investment Framework (SIF) for HIV/AIDS that showed that by increasing smart and focused investments now we can turn the tide against this disease and can realistically start talking about the end of AIDS.”
Nothing could be further from the truth.
In recent months Africa has been victim to
The resurgence of MSM coverage in HIV/AIDS is purely to promote the new HIV vaccines that are currently being researched by pharmaceutical corporations in conjunction with government bio-weapons agencies.
While the purpose of the vaccine to “cure” HIV will no doubt be preventative; meaning everyone will be expected to get the immunization, the threat of large amounts of the world’s populations becoming infected with HIV will become a reality in the near future.
As far as conspiracy theories go this is a good one. It makes sense that there is an eugenics agenda behind it all. Could this be true? Possibly. Nothing much more should amazes us that comes from the covert actions of governments. We do realize that most governments nowadays are basically fronts for corporations, don’t we? Lou
“According to the England Hypothesis, vaccine injury-induced autism is an intentional chemical manipulation used to create millions of worker drones – sterile, docile, unable to question the conditions handed to them for their lives, content with boring, repetitive tasks, placid, disposable and interchangeable. In short, autists are the ‘deltas’ and ‘epsilons’ of the brave New World Order toward which we are being herded through intentional social, political and genetic manipulation consistent with the genocidal aspirations of the globalists and their horrifying Agenda 21.”
August 3, 2013
What you are about to read is so shocking, disturbing and counter-intuitive that you will want to turn away from even the possibility that I am right. I urge you, for the sake of yourself and your family, to consider what I am presenting before rejecting it.
The England Hypothesis, named for its brilliant creator, Christina England, herself a mother of two adults severely injured by vaccines, is important enough to change our world. If I am correct and the England Hypothesis is accurate, it already is changing our world in unimaginable and horrifying ways – and no one noticed until Christina saw the pattern last week!
She shared it with me and the other Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation. We believe she has hit the nail on the head. Read on. Your world will never be the same.
No one would wish an autistic child on his/her family. No one could harm a child intentionally to that extent. No one wants to see minds and lives destroyed. Right?
Wrong, according to the England Hypothesis.
According to the England Hypothesis, vaccine injury-induced autism is an intentional chemical manipulation used to create millions of worker drones – sterile, docile, unable to question the conditions handed to them for their lives, content with boring, repetitive tasks, placid, disposable and interchangeable. In short, autists are the ‘deltas’ and ‘epsilons’ of the brave New World Order toward which we are being herded through intentional social, political and genetic manipulation consistent with the genocidal aspirations of the globalists and their horrifying Agenda 21.
A moment of historical perspective is in order, since this has been in the works for a very long time.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World was published in 1932. In that dystopian view of our future, babies were created to serve the state, raised in Hatcheries and Conditioning Centers, where they are divided into five castes, each designed to fulfill predetermined positions within the social and economic strata of the World State. Fetuses chosen to become members of the highest castes, ‘Alpha’ and ‘Beta’, are allowed to develop naturally while maturing to term in “decanting bottles”. Fetuses chosen to become members of the lower castes (‘Gamma’, ‘Delta’, ‘Epsilon’) are subjected to carefully designed specific chemical interference to cause arrested development in intelligence or physical growth.
High cast members are individuals since each ‘Alpha’ or ‘Beta’ is the product of one unique fertilized egg developing into one unique fetus. Members of lower castes are not unique but are interchangeable and disposable drones since large numbers are spawned from a single ovum.
We do not yet have decanting bottles and hatcheries in which to produce Genetically Modified babies. In our world, 2013, they are created with syringes. They are not called deltas and epsilons. They are called autistic people.
The England Hypothesis suddenly explains – and predicts, as any good hypothesis should – the otherwise inexplicable and currently mysterious.
It makes total sense out of the totally unscientific and irrational vigor with which world bodies support increasing numbers of highly toxic vaccines for every child, even before they are born, knowing full well that these children will be damaged – chemically altered – forever, but denying it with insane fervor. It also makes total sense out of the vicious and illogical attacks on those who call vaccines out for what they are: syringes of death, inefficient, inexact, illegal, uninsurable, disastrously dangerous and scientifically unsupported practice of vaccination.
Those who survive somewhat intact are intended for the bottom tier of the labor pool – the technicians and working prols keeping the Neo-Aristocrats clean, fed, mobile and entertained.
Some autistic people are employable. Some are not. But the ones who are are make perfect technoids: happy with routine tasks, happy with predictable, controlled environments and lives, happy with limited aspirations and capable of docile, life-long passivity if their routine needs are met, eager to please and sometimes very good at highly linear tasks like programing.
So autism, we realize, thanks to the brilliant insight of our Dr. Rima Reports guest this week, Christina England (mother of two autistic vaccine injured adults) is a useful trait induced in a large number of children for their technician classes.
Let’s test this horrifying hypothesis against the known facts, shall we? Goldman Sachs this week announced the funding of a program to hire the autistic. The links at the end of this article take you to just a few of the programs now receiving funding and plaudits from globalists like Goldman Sachs and Bill Gates.
As Lord David Freud, a Member of the House of Lords, said in his speech on March 20, 2012,
…it makes good business sense to employ people who are reliable, punctual and loyal; people who have good attention to detail and concentration levels; people who have excellent problem solving skills and can be analytical, resourceful and creative. What good employer wouldn’t want an employee with those skills?
Indeed, what good employer would not? But what lengths would that good employer and his friends go to in order to make sure that there were plenty of people in that pool, plenty of deltas and plenty of epsilons?
The length of a syringe, perhaps. The England Hypothesis, to which I subscribe, says they would – and, horrifyingly, do. Millions and millions of times per day, all over the world.
Fox News reports that SAP, a huge German company which employs 65,000 programmers world-wide now want 10% of their programmers to be autistic persons. Justifying their interest in autistic programmers, Fox tells us “The multinationals both say they hope to harness the unique talents of autistic people as well as giving people previously marginalized in the workforce a chance to flourish in a job.”
How nice. What about people with Spinal Bifida? Parkinson’s Disease? Cerebral Palsy, flipper limbs? harelip?
The propaganda is flowing, now that vaccine injured persons are reaching marketable age.
An article lauding a Goldman Sachs program to hire autistic persons says,
He is part of the most visible generation of young people with autism our society has ever known. Diagnosed early, this generation have been educated to expect not just a job when they leave school but a career on a par with their ‘neuro-typical’ contemporaries.
‘Neuro-typical’ sounds like Brave New World Order speak for Alphas and Betas.
Either you control your genetic matrix or someone else has the right to alter it for their purposes.
Oh, by the way, your support of the Natural Solutions Foundation is essential.
You should donate now to keep health freedom free. We cannot do it without your support. Here’s the link http://drrimatruthreports.com/action/donate/. Set up a generous recurring donation now. You should do this now.
Yours in health and freedom,
The Dr. Rima Truth Reports Interview with Christia England
08.01.13 10 PM Eastern at www.FreedomsLips.com – Studio B (Archive too)
Scientists in Japan have cloned a mouse from a single drop of blood.
Circulating blood cells collected from the tail of a donor mouse were used to produce the clone, a team at the Riken BioResource Center reports in the journal Biology of Reproduction.
The female mouse lived a normal lifespan and could give birth to young, say the researchers.
Scientists at a linked institute recently created nearly 600 exact genetic copies of one mouse.
Mice have been cloned from several different sources of donor cells, including white blood cells found in the lymph nodes, bone marrow and liver.
“This technique would be applicable for generating genetic copies of invaluable strains of mice”
Research team Riken BioResource Center, Tsukuba
The Japanese research group investigated whether circulating blood cells could also be used for cloning.
Their aim was to find an easily available source of donor cells to clone scientifically valuable strains of laboratory mice.
The team, led by Atsuo Ogura, of Riken BioResource Center in Tsukuba, took blood from the tail of a donor mouse, isolated the white blood cells, and used the nuclei for cloning experiments, using the same technique that produced Dolly the sheep in Edinburgh.
Reporting their findings in the US journal, Biology of Reproduction, they said the study “demonstrated for the first time that mice could be cloned using the nuclei of peripheral blood cells”.
‘Invaluable strains’ They added: “These cells could be used for cloning immediately after collection and no donor animals need to be euthanised.
“This technique would be applicable for generating genetic copies of invaluable strains of mice, which cannot be preserved by other assisted reproductive techniques such as conventional in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.”
Scientists in Japan have years of experience in cloning mice.
A team at a linked institute recently revealed they had produced almost 600 mice from one donor mouse after 25 consecutive rounds of cloning.
The research is aimed at large-scale production of high-quality animals for farming or conservation purposes.
From and with kind permission of WorldTruth.TV
Crazy worldwide scientists are “playing God” with the same building blocks of life. Today, thanks to extraordinary advances in the field of genetic modification, scientists are now able to do things that were once unthinkable.
Hybrid monsters part human / part animal are being created by the scientists of the world and everything is perfectly legal. The scientists justify mixing the DNA of humans and animals, claiming that it will help them “cure disease” and “feed the world”, but the reality is that all this genetic modification is a huge threat to the human race.
It is only a matter of time before humans begin to afford themselves genetically modified in order to “fight against diseases” or “improve” its capabilities.
The temptation to insert genes from animals or plants in people in order to create “super soldiers” or a “superior race” undoubtedly become too tempting. Unless something is done to contain all of this, it will apparently be almost certain outbreak of genetic hell on the human race.
Once genetically modified humans begin to breed to normal humans not we put the genie back bottle. Eventually, we could reach the point where there is “100 %” very few human beings. Jeremy Rifkin and his question: we are on the cusp of the biological Renaissance, as some believe, or we’re scattering the seeds of our own destruction? It has sounded the alarm in the Los Angeles Times about what is happening in the field of genetic research, pursuing the creation of hybrid specimens therapeutic purposes, half human, half animal, unless you know for sure where these works will lead.
Stanford University intends to inject human cells in the fetus of a mouse, thereby creating a variety of mouse humanoid by 1%. It also aims to create a mouse with 100% of human cells. On the other hand, as reported by Der Spiegel, scientists from the Max Planck Institute in Germany have implanted human stem cells into the brains of monkeys, with the aim of developing possible genetic treatments of some neurodegenarativas diseases.
Finally, in the University of Reno, United States, as reported by msnbc, there are a flock of 50 sheep possessing partially human livers, hearts with human cells and even brains with human footprints. It is the first herd of animals “humans” which is constancy.
Becomes the “Humanzee” in other experiments will have injected human stem cells in mice, human DNA has been introduced in rabbits, pigs carrying in his veins human blood and sheep with livers and heart to a large extent have been created human. According to Rifkin, some scientists have proposed even to create a “humanzee” (of the human and chimpanzee English) that would be the ideal Guinea pig for research laboratories.
The chimpanzee shares with us 98% of the human genome and an adult has the mental level of a four-year-old boy. The first experience of genetic creation took place a few years ago in Edinburgh, Scotland, when scientists mixed an embryo of Lamb with goat, two animal species without any kinship between themselves and they are incapable of mating.
The result, a creature that had head of goat and lamb body. The intent that lies behind this research is crossing our species with animals to obtain hybrids of all classes that represent a panacea for medical research.
Scientists consider that more resemble an animal to a human, easier will be simulating the progression of human diseases in their flesh, experimenting new drugs and collect tissue of organs that can be implanted in people.
This idea also means the creation through genetic manipulation of animal organs that can then be transplanted in their entirety to sick people. At the legal border so far, all of these experiments are developed within the law, according to its authors, while some are being investigated. The Academy of the science of United States is limited for the moment to ‘recommend’ that should not be inserted human cells in embryos of chimpanzees and other primates.
However, the National Council of the ethics of Germany has raised a protest by the experiments of the Max Planck Institute, who have managed to develop tumors in the nervous system of the apes after implanting them with human cells in the brain. But the consequences of these investigations, that otherwise take years to provide valid results for medicine, can be considerable.
Socially ethical debate if it can humanize animals and then deprive them of the dignity that we have recognized as a species is already raised.
On the other hand, is the danger that some hybrids created in laboratory escape and populate the Earth, unless you know yet what consequences can illuminate for other species, the environment and even the human society.
Question unanswered as it raises Rifkin, scientists have achieved the power of rewriting the history of the evolution: spreading parts of Homo sapiens in the rest of the animal Kingdom and merge parts of other species with our own genome and even create new subspecies and superespecies.
The question still unanswered is: we are on the cusp of the biological Renaissance, as some believe, or we’re scattering the seeds of our own destruction?
via Untitled Album.
The patents were challenged by scientists and doctors who said their research and ability to help patients had been frustrated. The particular genes at issue received public attention after the actress Angelina Jolie revealed in May that she had had a preventive double mastectomy after learning that she had inherited a faulty copy of a gene that put her at high risk for breast cancer.
The Illuminati is a fascinating conspiracy. The best part of it is that if you bring it up you are automatically dismissed as of weak mind or something. If you are intrigued by it, Eddie from WorldTruth TV has done one of the most interesting posts that I have seen on the subject. he throws in everything: Big Pharma, Chemtrails, secret societies, the list is endless. So endless that I have never seen a subject light up so many categories for a post before.
Either way, it is good entertainment.
With kind permission and from Eddie at | World Truth.TV
An illusion it will be, so large, so vast, it will escape their perception.
Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.
We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us.
We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive.
Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon our selves.
This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur.
We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute.
We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy.
Death will come to he who speaks.
We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite.
We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening.
We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water; also in the air.
They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.
The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds.
The poisons will be absorbed through their skin and mouths; they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems.
From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.
The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.
We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far.
We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones.
Those they look up to will help.
We will enlist them to push our poisons.
They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect.
When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them it’s for their help.
We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.
When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future.
We will render them docile and weak before us by our power.
They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison.
We will focus their attention toward money and material goods so they many never connect with their inner self.
We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures and games so they may never be one with the oneness of it all.
Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say.
If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering technology into their lives.
We will use fear as our weapon.
We will establish their governments and establish opposites within.
We will own both sides.
We will always hide our objective but carry out our plan.
They will perform the labor for us and we shall prosper from their toil.
Our families will never mix with theirs.
Our blood must be pure always, for that is the way.
We will make them kill each other when it suits us.
We will keep them separated from the oneness by dogma and religion.
We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to think and how.
We will guide them kindly and gently letting them think they are guiding themselves.
We will foment animosity between them through our factions.
When a light shall shine among them, we shall extinguish it by ridicule, or death,
whichever suits us best.
We will make them rip each other’s hearts apart and kill their own children.
We will accomplish this by using hate as our ally, anger as our friend.
The hate will blind them totally, and never shall they see that from their conflicts we emerge as their rulers.
They will be busy killing each other.
They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors for as long as we see fit.
We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they cannot see us.
We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths.
We shall repeat this over and over until our ultimate goal is accomplished.
We will continue to make them live in fear and anger though images and sounds.
We will use all the tools we have to accomplish this.
The tools will be provided by their labor.
We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors.
We will always hide the divine truth from them; that we are all one.
This they must never know! They must never know that color is an illusion.
They must always think they are not equal.
Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal.
We will take over their land, resources and wealth to exercise total control over them.
We will deceive them into accepting laws that will steal the little freedom they will have.
We will establish a money system that will imprison them forever, keeping them and their children in debt.
When they shall band together, we shall accuse them of crimes and present a different story to the world for we shall own all the media.
We will use our media to control the flow of information and their sentiment in our favor.
When they shall rise up against us we will crush them like insects, for they are less than that.
They will be helpless to do anything for they will have no weapons.
We will recruit some of their own to carry out our plans.
We will promise them eternal life, but eternal life they will never have for they are not of us.
The recruits will be called “initiates” and will be indoctrinated to believe false rites of passage to higher realms.
Members of these groups will think they are one with us never knowing the truth.
They must never learn this truth for they will turn against us.
For their work they will be rewarded with earthly things and great titles, but never will they become immortal and join us.
Never will they receive the light and travel the stars.
They will never reach the higher realms, for the killing of their own kind will prevent passage to the realm of enlightenment.
This they will never know.
The truth will be hidden in their face, so close they will not be able to focus on it until its too late.
Oh yes, so grand the illusion of freedom will be, that they will never know they are our slaves.
When all is in place, the reality we will have created for them will own them.
This reality will be their prison.
They will live in self-delusion.
When our goal is accomplished a new era of domination will begin.
Their minds will be bound by their beliefs, the beliefs we have established from time immemorial.
But if they ever find out they are our equal, we shall perish then.
THIS THEY MUST NEVER KNOW.
If they ever find out that together they can vanquish us, they will take action.
They must never, ever find out what we have done, for if they do, we shall have no place to run, for it will be easy to see who we are once the veil has fallen.
Our actions will have revealed who we are and they will hunt us down and no person shall give us shelter.
This is the secret covenant by which we shall live the rest of our present and future lives, for this reality will transcend many generations and life spans.
This covenant is sealed by blood, our blood.
We, the ones who from heaven to earth came.
This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist.
It must NEVER, EVER be written or spoken of for if it is, the consciousness it will spawn will release the fury of the PRIME CREATOR upon us and we
shall be cast to the depths from whence we came and remain there until the end time of infinity itself.
Implied – One who wishes to move his country forward.
Actual – One who wishes to move his country toward a state-socialism.
Implied – One who wishes to be more feminine, and wishes to protect feminine ideas and custom.
Actual – One who wishes to be more masculine, and destroy differences between the sexes.
Implied : Action which is correct (“Affirmative” means correct, and “Action” is normally good as well)
Actual : Preferential treatment for a particular minority group. (See : Apartheid, Racism)
*For more NLP examples Big Brother uses, read 1984.*
Based on the test, doctors estimated Jolie had an 87 per cent risk of breast cancer and a 50 per cent risk of ovarian cancer, which is why she said she opted for the procedure.
‘If you have to get two cases of cancer in the family to qualify for testing, you’re only going to prevent the third [cancer]. We should be preventing the first one.’— Cancer researcher Dr. Steven Narod
Dr. Stephen Narod, a senior scientist at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, has followed the debate about the article, but says that in scrutinizing Jolie’s decision, pundits and readers are missing a broader lesson about access to genetic testing.
“I heard so many dumb opinions over the last couple of days, [but] no one asks: why aren’t we efficiently offering this to Canadians?” says Narod, who believes that people should have equal access to genetic tests.
Genetic testing is meant to identify people who have an increased risk of getting cancer by looking for mutations in genes on a chromosome. In the case of Jolie, it was a test that looked specifically for the BRCA mutation.
Anyone can get a genetic test, but it is quite expensive — private clinics in the U.S. will do it for about $3,000 to $4,000. In Canada, provincial governments will cover the cost of the test, but only if the individual meets specific criteria.
There are nuances in the criteria from province to province, but the main requirement is that you can demonstrate that two of your blood relatives have had breast or ovarian cancer.
Narod says that the current criteria are too restrictive.
“If you have to get two cases of cancer in the family to qualify for testing, you’re only going to prevent the third [cancer]. We should be preventing the first one,” says Narod.
According to the American Cancer Society, only about five to 10 per cent of all cancers are inherited. Most cancers develop as a result of lifestyle choices (such as smoking) or environmental factors.
Approximately 90 per cent of breast and ovarian cancer cases are considered “sporadic,” meaning there’s no family history of cancer and it is not associated with a BRCA mutation, says Barbara Vanderhyden, a senior scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute who focuses on ovarian cancer research.
Angelina Jolie announced on May 14 that she had had a preventative double mastectomy. (Carlo Allegri/Associated Press)As a result, the BRCA test provides a good picture of a person’s risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer, but only for a small percentage of women, says Vanderhyden.
“For women without a family history, there really isn’t any reason to go through the potential trauma of having the genetic testing if the likelihood is so low that a mutation is actually present,” she says.
She adds that the criteria in her home province, Ontario, “tries to capture everyone who might be at significant risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer.”
The Canadian Cancer Society says on its website that genetic testing “only provides a piece of information about a person’s health. Other genetic and environmental factors and lifestyle choices affect a person’s risk of developing cancer.”
The organization goes on to say that genetic testing “is most useful when it is done in a family member with cancer who also has a family history that suggests a particular hereditary cancer syndrome.”
In the New York Times piece, Jolie herself acknowledged that “only a fraction of breast cancers result from an inherited gene mutation.”
While her story transfixed people the world over, Narod says Jolie’s case has particular relevance to Canadians because her mother, Marcheline Bertrand, was French-Canadian.
Over the course of his research into breast and ovarian cancer, Narod has identified mutations in a number of specific ethnic populations, including people of French-Canadian, Bahamian and Ashkenazi Jewish descent.
If genetic tests were made affordable and available to everybody, rather than just to those with a family history of cancer, more people would have a better idea of their risk of developing cancer, says Narod.
“There are hundreds of women in Quebec who have [the BRCA] mutation and are walking around with it. We should be doing everything in our power to identify them to give them the options” for dealing with it, Narod says.
BBC News -
Human cloning has been used to produce early embryos, marking a “significant step” for medicine, say US scientists.
The cloned embryos were used as a source of stem cells, which can make new heart muscle, bone, brain tissue or any other type of cell in the body.
However, researchers say other sources of stem cells may be easier, cheaper and less controversial.
Opponents say it is unethical to experiment on human embryos and have called for a ban.
Stem cells are one of the great hopes for medicine. Being able to create new tissue might be able to heal the damage caused by a heart attack or repair a severed spinal cord.
There are already trials taking place using stem cells taken from donated embryos to restore people’s sight.
However, these donated cells do not match the patient so they would be rejected by the body. Cloning bypasses this problem.
The technique used – somatic cell nuclear transfer – has been well-known since Dolly the sheep became the first mammal to be cloned, in 1996.
Skin cells were taken from an adult and the genetic information was placed inside a donor egg which had been stripped of its own DNA. Electricity was used to encourage the egg to develop into an embryo.
However, researchers have struggled to reproduce the feat in people. The egg does start dividing, but never goes past the 6-12 cell stage.
A South Korean scientist, Hwang Woo-suk, did claim to have created stem cells from cloned human embryos, but was found to have faked the evidence.
Now a team at the Oregon Health and Science University have developed the embryo to the blastocyst stage – around 150 cells – which is enough to provide a source of embryonic stem cells.
Could scientists fully clone a person? It’s an interesting question that emerges from this research.
These researchers have certainly developed a cloned embryo further than anyone else.
But producing a five-day-old embryo is a world away from a woman giving birth to the first human clone.
The embryo would need to be implanted as per IVF, but primate research shows that things often go wrong before the clone is born.
Prof Robin Lovell-Badge of the UK National Institute for Medical Research said: “It is an unsafe procedure in animals and it will similarly be an unsafe procedure in humans. For this reason alone it should not be attempted.”
It would also be illegal is some countries, such as the UK, which differentiate between “therapeutic” and “reproductive” cloning.
Dr Shoukhrat Mitalipov said: “A thorough examination of the stem cells derived through this technique demonstrated their ability to convert just like normal embryonic stem cells, into several different cell types, including nerve cells, liver cells and heart cells.
“While there is much work to be done in developing safe and effective stem cell treatments, we believe this is a significant step forward in developing the cells that could be used in regenerative medicine.”
Chris Mason, a professor of regenerative medicine at University College London, said this looked like “the real deal”.
“They’ve done the same as the Wright brothers really. They’ve looked around at where are all the best bits of how to do this from different groups all over the place and basically amalgamated it.
“The Wright brothers took off and this has actually managed to make embryonic stem cells.”
The ethical rival
Embryonic stem cell research has repeatedly raised ethical concerns and human eggs are a scarce resource. This has led researchers to an alternative route to stem cells.
The technique takes the same sample of skin cells but converts them using proteins to “induced pluripotent” stem cells.
However, there are still questions about the quality of stem cells produced using this method compared with embryonic stem cells.
Prof Mason said the field was leaning towards induced pluripotent stem cells: “It has got a lot of momentum behind it, a lot of funding and a lot of powerful people now.”
Dr Lyle Armstrong, at Newcastle University, said that the study “without doubt” marked an advance for the field.
But he warned: “Ultimately, the costs of somatic cell nuclear transfer-based methods for making stem cells could be prohibitive.”
Opponents of the new technique argue that all embryos, whether created in the lab or not, have the potential to go on to become a fully-fledged human, and as such it is morally wrong to experiment on them.
They strongly advocate the use of stem cells from adult tissue.
Dr David King, from the campaign group Human Genetics Alert, warned that: “Scientists have finally delivered the baby that would-be human cloners have been waiting for: a method for reliably creating cloned human embryos.
“This makes it imperative that we create an international legal ban on human cloning before any more research like this takes place. It is irresponsible in the extreme to have published this research.”
However advocates of the new technique say that the embryos created from this technique could never become viable human beings.